Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • This professional traveler reveals how to tour the world without any remorse
    • Spring of 2025 external equipment and new books guide
    • The 18 best beaches in the world
    • River mares in Tanzania: Heavy weights in Africa
    • How to decide which one chooses
    • Tarangy National Park: The hidden jewel of Tanzania
    • 15 Something to do around Chautauqua Lake, New York – a short drive from Buffalo, Cleveland, or Pitsburgh
    • Discover the magic of relaxation and rich history of hot springs, Arkansas: a perfect mix of nature and culture
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    ZEMS BLOG
    • Home
    • Sports
    • Reel
    • Worklife
    • Travel
    • Future
    • Culture
    • Politics
    • Weather
    • Financial Market
    • Crypto
    ZEMS BLOG
    Home » Opinion: Confiscation of frozen Russian assets to support the Ukrainian army and finance its recovery
    Financial Market

    Opinion: Confiscation of frozen Russian assets to support the Ukrainian army and finance its recovery

    ZEMS BLOGBy ZEMS BLOGJanuary 5, 2024No Comments6 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    “ The international community can and must do more to help Ukraine.“

    As Russia's war against Ukraine continues to wreak havoc at the regional and global levels, the Ukrainian people and their allies are showing extraordinary determination and courage. But nearly two years after Russia launched its full-scale invasion, it has become increasingly clear that the international community can and must do more to help.

    While G7 countries and other governments around the world have been extraordinarily generous in supporting the Ukrainian war effort, there are signs of growing fatigue in some quarters – a development that Russia appears to have anticipated. With the failure of the United States and the European Union to commit more than $100 billion in aid to Ukraine in December, the idea of ​​seizing Russian assets frozen by Western countries has resurfaced as a possible solution.

    Although seizing these assets would boost Ukraine's morale and finances, policymakers on both sides of the Atlantic are concerned. like New York times As recently reported, senior US officials fear that setting such a precedent will deter other countries from depositing their money at the New York Federal Reserve or holding it in US dollars.

    But concerns that other governments might become wary of keeping their money in the United States for fear of future seizure miss some key points. Seizing Russia's frozen assets would not affect the assets of other countries or change the incentives of governments that are not planning a major war. Moreover, by not confiscating these funds, Western countries indicate that governments waging brutal wars of aggression can both violate international law and take advantage of it to escape the consequences of their actions. Instead, G7 leaders must send a clear message: no country can have it both ways. By deterring other bad actors from violating international law, such confiscations can serve as a peacebuilding measure.

    The supposed negative impact of the Russian asset seizure on the willingness of other countries to deposit funds in the United States and Europe, if real, would have been evident when these funds were frozen in early 2022. Notably, there was no capital flight from the United States. Or Europe. This is partly because there are few safe alternatives to the existing financial system. Assuming that governments become cautious about keeping their assets in the United States, Europe, or Japan, where else might they keep them? Even setting aside concerns such as capital controls, would they feel safer keeping their money in Chinese institutions, for example?

    Moreover, while European and Japanese institutions may benefit if other “rogue” countries decide not to hold their deposits in the United States, the financial impact will be minimal. Indeed, many economists argue that such capital flows are a cost, not a benefit. According to this argument, it increases the value of the currency, makes it more difficult to export goods and compete with imports, and thus destroys jobs.

    To be sure, some financiers may face losses. But most of the money held in the United States is simply reserves on deposit with the Federal Reserve, which does not directly benefit Wall Street. The same applies to Euroclear, the Belgian financial institution where the bulk of Russian assets are held.

    “A tool that cannot be used is essentially worthless, and there has never been a more appropriate time to use it than now.“

    Another related argument against asset seizures is that asset seizures can only happen once, because once they are done, a country will not leave its reserves or other assets in the United States or the European Union. But even if true, the argument is not convincing: a tool that cannot be used is essentially worthless, and there has never been a more appropriate time to use it than now.

    Ultimately, Russia must be held accountable. Although Russia cannot fully compensate Ukraine for the devastation it caused, it must at least pay for the material damage and cover the costs of reconstruction. When an individual commits a tort—an act that harms another person—he is obligated to make compensation. Often, individuals' assets are seized to ensure they meet this obligation. The same principle applies to countries. Although asset confiscations are often complex processes, the case of Russia may be the exception, because the assets to be seized have already been frozen.

    Legal experts would argue that providing loans to Kiev and using the frozen assets as collateral is a better approach, because it would force Russia to choose between compensating Ukraine directly or confiscating these funds. But such technical matters are best left to lawyers. The fact is that Ukraine needs money now, Money is under Western control, Not using it to help Ukraine win this war and rebuild would be unconscionable. It is unreasonable to expect taxpayers and donors in Europe, the United States, and Asia to bear the costs of Ukraine's reconstruction when Russia itself can make a significant (albeit involuntary) contribution.

    But the specific use of the confiscated funds is a secondary concern. While 90% of US security aid allocated to Ukraine is spent in the United States, captured Russian assets could be used to support Ukrainian forces on the ground and fund massive recovery efforts.

    We should not say that seizing frozen Russian assets will not absolve the West of responsibility for providing Ukraine with military aid; Without victory, reconstruction is not possible. However, the fact that rebuilding Ukraine may ultimately cost $1 trillion – more than three times the value of the assets – may soothe those who remain reluctant to use it to finance reconstruction efforts.

    Of course, no amount of money will be able to repair the enormous damage that Russia's war of aggression has inflicted on Ukraine's economy and its people. But the frozen Russian assets can be viewed as a down payment for the reparations the Kremlin will eventually have to pay.

    Joseph E. Stiglitz, a Nobel laureate in economics, a professor at Columbia University, and a 2018 Sydney Peace Prize winner. Andrew Kosenko is an assistant professor of economics in the School of Management at Marist College.

    This commentary is published with permission from Project Syndicate —Seizing Russia's frozen assets is the right move.

    Source link

    ZEMS BLOG
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleArgentine Foreign Minister confirms acceptance of Bitcoin in contract agreements
    Next Article Saturday's storm to bring a messy mix
    ZEMS BLOG
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Rail Gun rises 130.3%: What are analysts' expectations?

    April 17, 2024

    USDCAD is once again above the 1.38000 level

    April 17, 2024

    The changing face of marketing in the digital age

    April 17, 2024
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    This professional traveler reveals how to tour the world without any remorse

    May 30, 2025

    Spring of 2025 external equipment and new books guide

    May 29, 2025

    The 18 best beaches in the world

    May 28, 2025

    River mares in Tanzania: Heavy weights in Africa

    May 26, 2025
    Recent Posts
    • This professional traveler reveals how to tour the world without any remorse
    • Spring of 2025 external equipment and new books guide
    • The 18 best beaches in the world
    • River mares in Tanzania: Heavy weights in Africa
    • How to decide which one chooses
    About

    ZEMS BLOG in partnership with Holiday Omega keeps you informed. Bringing you the latest news from around the world with fresh perspectives and unique insights. Your daily source for news from around the world. All perspectives, all curated for a global audience.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube Telegram
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    Subscribe For latest updates

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.